Proyecto Severo Ochoa IFIC

Presentación del tema: "Proyecto Severo Ochoa IFIC"— Transcripción de la presentación:

1 Proyecto Severo Ochoa IFIC
20 diciembre 2017, Severo Ochoa, J. J. Hernández Rey

2 Midterm evaluation (2015-2017)
Documentos requeridos Memoria económica abreviada Self-evaluation Report Summary Activities and Outputs Indicators 2.1 Comment on present indicators 2.2 Updated objectives Benchmarking (comparison to other centres) Summary of expenditures External evaluations Improvement in the research program Main Planning and Monitoring Indicators Currrent values Updated monitoring indicators Difusión, comunicación y publicidad de la ayuda Informe detallado con ejemplos concretos Informe del Comité científico asesor Libres Report to the Scientific Advisory Committee Informes voluntarios No se enviaron Exposición presencial Expertos de varias disciplinas Exposición de 20 minutos 40 minutos de preguntas

3 Scientific Advisory Committee
Current SAC members: Gustavo C. Branco (CFTP/IST, University of Lisbon) William Gelletly (University of Surrey) Francis Halzen (University of Wisconsin) Cecilia Jarlskog, Chair (University of Lund) Peter Jenni (Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg and CERN) Antonio Masiero (INFN and University of Padova) Tatsuya Nakada (EPFL, Lausanne) Bing-Song Zou (IHEP, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing) Meeting July 19-20, 2017 Two presentations (Director and member of SC) A report previously delivered Interviews with young and senior researchers Visit to labs and premises Positive report: Considered we were pursuing the promised mission of the SO project Underlined that our research focuses in topics at the forefront of today’s physics research Approved our successful recruiting and career fostering actions Praised our effort on innovation and transfer Judged positively outreach, colloquia, etc. Pointed out areas of concern Rejuvenation of scientists Gender issues Technical personnel

4 Monitoring indicators
High-impact scientific publications: number and impact of the records published by IFIC authors in the first quartile in any subject category (as found in the main databases: Web of Science/JCR or Scopus/SJR) Presentation of results at conferences and workshops by IFIC members: total number per year (invited, plenary, parallel talks, as well as posters) Recruiting and training: number of finished PhD theses with IFIC advisors. Since the organization of seminars and colloquia is fruitful for the training of young researchers, the number of seminars and colloquia are included as indicators. Granted patents and other Intellectual Property Rights: the number of International Patent Applications (PCT) and License Grants Delivered. External sources of funding: focusing on the European Funding Agencies, we proposed as indicators the amount of funding obtained from European calls (including ERC, H2020 and others) and the number of ERC projects obtained by IFIC researchers. Dissemination and outreach activities involving IFIC members: here we followed CSIC’s indicators and proposed the total number of outreach events and materials. Gender indicator: people hired under the S.O. project. As a general rule, for the key quantitative indicators (number of high-quality publications, PhD theses, seminars, etc.), the comparison of a homogenous period of five years with the previously known results of the period was proposed, where the year 2013 acted as baseline. We show in Table 1 the progress of the selected indicators, with data up to June 2017, except for the number of talks at conferences and outreach activities (not yet fully available for the present year).

5 Monitoring indicators

6 Indicators We achieve the goals in the key quantitative indicators
Scientific publications in Q1 Proposed 30% increase: 219 papers/year (reference) → 284 papers/year (target) At midterm: 396 papers/year High level training: PhD Theses defended Proposed 10% increase: 12.8/year (reference) → 14 (target) At midterm: 15.5 year Presentation at conferences Proposed 5% increase: 250/year (reference) → 260/year (target) At midterm: 316/year Other targets are met too European Projects: 3.8 M€ (reference) → 6.65 M€ (target). Now: 4.07 M€ ERC grants: 1 Advanced + 1 Consolidator Licensed grants: 0 (ref) → 4 (target). Now: 2 … Gender, a very ambitious goal: > 30% 38% (predocs) + 22% (postdocs) + 20% (engineers and others) We revise upwards our indicator targets Increase in Scientific publications Q1: 30% → 50% Increase in PhD Theses: 10% → 20% Dissemination and outreach: 10% Indicators

7 Recruiting, career fostering (SRP 8.2.2)
RyC Scientist E / T Call Status Michel Sorel exp 2008 Contract S8A → CT-2015 Luis Alvarez Ruso teo 2009 Extension S8A → CT-2015 Cesar Domingo Pardo 2010 Jose E. García Navarro Extension S8A → CT-2016 Roberto Ruiz de Austri Extension S8A → CT-2016 Fostering “Ramón y Cajal” researchers career Fund contract extensions: exceedingly successful results Attracting excellent postdocs Dedicated call with overwhelming response. 15 positions filled Predoc recruiting and career fostering Fully benefit from FPI and “la Caixa” PhD contracts “Bridge” contracts for starting and end phases Master student’s programme “Pick” the best master students Winning attention of brilliant undergraduate students Summer Student Programme. Make good students aware of IFIC possibilities Reinforce experimental activities with engineers/technicians Take advantage of PTA Programme Postdocs Year EXP TEO TOTAL 2015/2016 8 7 15 PhD Students Master Students Year FPI La Caixa Bridge 2015/2016 6 3 2 2016/2017 4 2017/2018 Total 14 Year Theo Exp 2015/2016 8 5 2016/2017 3 2017/2018 Total 14 15 Year Applications Freshmen Sophomores Juniors Seniors Total 2016 Received 5 17 11 2 35 Accepted 3 12 4 1 20 2017 16 13 60 7 10 22 Mechanics: 2 Electronics: 6 Computing: 2 Management: 1 Outreach: 1 Summer Students

8 How are permanent positions opened?
How do you measure the impact of your outreach? How do you see the future of particle physics in the coming years? How do you tackle the problem of hundreds of authors in papers? Why do you have so few women as speakers in Colloquia and Seminar?

9 “The Monitoring Committee considers that the thorough material provided for the Mid Term Evaluation, the extensive SAC report of July 2017 and the very effective presentation from the Director, clearly indicate that IFIC is running at an excellent rate during the first grant period of the SO program, with visible benefits and solid progress on all aspects. The SO grant has been used wisely, with an optimal strategy and tangible results. The added value of the excellence award has been cleverly exploited. In agreement with the extremely positive SAC evaluation, one can say that IFIC is an institute that operates at the highest international scientific level and that, after the relatively short period of 2 years, it has already shown a remarkable growth and very high benefits from the SO grant. IFIC has pursued its planned scientific mission with excellent outcome, strengthening areas related to new physics on both theory and experimental side, and setting up measures to produce cutting edge technology. The results obtained and the roles played are surely belonging to the highest levels of the international panorama, where IFIC has gained a significantly increased visibility.”

10 Excelentes ¡hasta en burocracia!
Concluido el Acuerdo CSIC-UV para el S8A Ha llevado dos años el incluir a la UV como beneficiario asociado del Proyecto Severo Ochoa La opinión era :“Lasciate ogni speranza!” El retraso va a causar algunas disfunciones, pero es positivo que el acuerdo UV-CSIC se haya aprobado

11 Calendario de la petición de declaración de la UV como beneficiario asociado
17/09/2015: Escrito al Equipo Gestor (S.G. Planificación y Seguimiento) solicitando transferencia de fondos a la UV. 09/12/2015: Respuesta equipo Gestor: es posible, hay que hacer instancia a través de Explican qué documentos hay que entregar. 14/12/2015: Contactamos con convenios del CSIC (ya estaba previamente hablado y aceptado a nivel VICYT y Vicerrectorado Investigación UV). Convenios del CSIC envía plantilla de convenio. Rellenamos plantilla. Interaccionamos con la Universidad para llegar a un Convenio aceptable para CSIC y UV. 03/03/2016: Tras varias iteraciones se pasa un borrador del Convenio al equipo Gestor SO 04/03/2016: Sugerencias del equipo Gestor incorporadas. Nueva versión enviada. 11/04/2016: Tras diversas iteraciones con el equipo Gestor se envía otra nueva versión del Convenio. 23/04/2016: Versión final del Convenio para subir a Se presenta la instancia en 04/05/2016: Algún problema con la VICYT del CSIC. 06/05/2016: El Representante Legal del CSIC firma la instancia. 09/05/2016: Se envían algunos documentos más que pide el Equipo Gestor. 08/09/2016: En revisión por la Intervención. 21/09/2016: La Presidencia de la Agencia Estatal de Investigación “autoriza con efectos desde el día de la firma del Convenio […] la aplicación de la condición de beneficiario a la Universidad de Valencia” 28/09/2016: El MINHAP comunica al CSIC que se paraliza el acuerdo para dar cumplimiento a la Orden de cierre de ejercicio dada por Hacienda el pasado 16 de julio 09/02/2017: La Secretaría de Estado de Presupuestos y Gastos informa favorablemente, pero la Ley 40/2015 exige nuevos requisitos: informe de la Abogacía del Estado y autorización del Ministerio de Hacienda. El CSIC nos pide una “Memoria Justificativa” según modelo. 14/02/2017: Se envía al CSIC Memoria Justificativa. La VORI pide al abogado del Estado informe. 11/07/2017: Convenios del CSIC nos comunica que el abogado del Estado ha emitido informe favorable sobre el convenio. Pero nos indican que quedan los siguientes pasos: Autorización del Ministerio de Presidencia Autorización de firma de Hacienda Ratificación del Consejo de Ministros Registro y publicación en el BOE. 29/09/2017: El área de convenios dice que el convenio está en Consejo de Ministros y que una vez aprobado, sólo faltaría registro y publicación en el BOE. Nos piden el documento RC de retención de créditos. 06/10/2017: Nos piden de nuevo un texto sobre el objeto del convenio. Se les envía. 15/11/2017: Recibimos de la Vicesecretaria General Técnica del CSIC el Acuerdo de Ministros diligenciado. 16/11/2017: Convenio firmado por CSIC (VORI) y UV (Vice de IyPC) 8/12/2017: Convenio publicado en el B.O.E.

12 Conclusiones The SO had a large impact in recruiting and career fostering Instrumental in stabilising our hard-won RyCs Critical in supporting our experimental activities with technical personnel Helped amplify our training and research capacities (PhD’s, postdocs. master and undergraduates) It has bolstered cohesion Groups have been drawn together and it helped shape the research Visibility of the institute has increased sizeably Professionally, in the media, with the general public Other advantages Matching funds for equipment and infrastructure calls Heterodox, creative support (e.g. Japan-Spain industry meeting ILC, extreme life in underground labs) Fringe benefits and perks Invited to policy committees (e.g. GVA call design → promote excellence) Participate in transfer initiatives and the like.

13