Ubiquitous computing in a connected world Smart house cities, … Infrastructure Core (cloud) Sensory swarm, actuators and real world data Mobile.

Presentación del tema: "Ubiquitous computing in a connected world Smart house cities, … Infrastructure Core (cloud) Sensory swarm, actuators and real world data Mobile."— Transcripción de la presentación:

1

2

3

4 Ubiquitous computing in a connected world
Smart house cities, … Infrastructure Core (cloud) Sensory swarm, actuators and real world data Mobile access Courtesy Jan M. Rabaey, UC Berkeley, updated for this HiPEAC vision 6

5 Estudio de Mercado Máquinas de propósito general: 100 millones de procesadores vendidos Sistemas empotrados: 3 mil millones de procesadores vendidos. 2% 98%

6 Limited frequency increase  more cores
Data from Kunle Olukotun, Lance Hammond, Herb Sutter, Burton Smith, Chris Batten, and Krste Asanoviç 9

7

8 Intel® Pentium M (Pentium M = P6 Modified for Low Power Mobile)
Mobile Pentium 4 Mobile Intel® Celeron Basados en Pentium M (Celeron M) Basados en Microarquitectura Core Intel® Core Basados en Pentium M Core Duo Core Solo Basados en Microarquitectura Core 5. Basados en Haswell Core 2 Solo idem Core i3 i5 i7 Core 2 Duo Core 2 Quad Core 2 Extreme Basados en Microarquitectura Nehalem 4. Basados en Microarquitectura Sandy Bridge Core i Core i3 2nd Core i Core i5 2nd Core i Core i7 2nd Core vPro Core vPro 2nd

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18 And real life in CMS Detectors interleaved with the magnet yoke steel layers Jesús_Puerta_Pelayo_CIEMAT_Madrid

19 ALICE TPC: courtesy of CERN
Nowadays, these systems get bigger and bigger Contructed with industrial methods

20 The CMS Tracker 206 m² area 25.000 silicon sensors
10Mio strips  electronic channels readoud chips bonds analog optical links 3.000 km optical fibers

21 ECAL: Assembly and Performance
Response to high energy electrons Temperature Stability: ≤ 0.1 °C Light response stability: ≤ 0.1% 9/10/2018

22 CMS ECAL in the cavern 2007 Interesting is also the working platform

23 9. Conclusions: H264 vs WebM battle. HTML5 Google, Mozilla, Apple
9. Conclusions: H264 vs WebM battle. HTML5 Google, Mozilla, Apple. For Mobile.

24